Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter's avatar

Kissinger's legacy, if ever honestly evaluated, will show that yes, he opened China to the US, but at the same time he is responsible for the deaths of close to 4M people. Vietnam, Cambodia, Chile, Bangladesh, the Middle East (yes, let's not forget he got a 1973 peace proposal quashed). The list is long. The war crimes are clear. And yet the US FP establishment, and too many US senior politicians, loved him. I, for one, never saw what he had done to deserve the acclaim. What I only saw was a Nixon accomplice who kept the Vietnam War going to get Nixon elected in 1968 and re-elected in 1972. And the guy who wanted to be friends with the Khmer Rouge, and turned a blind eye to repression of Jews in the Soviet Union.

Expand full comment
Observer's avatar

Hi Ruth, thank you for the reminder that Kissinger encouraged Nixon to overthrow Allende in Chile and install a real dictator, Pinochet, instead. I believe Kissinger also encouraged the carpet bombing of Cambodia that massacred thousands, I imagine. I think too many of us have accepted that rulers will be rulers, so to speak, and the violence they perpetrate upon one another in the domination game is just something the rest of us have to tolerate. Ever since World War I and the advent of the airplane in warfare, greater proportions of civilians have been massacred in each successive war. Now, in Putin's war on Ukrainians and Hamas's atrocities on Israelis, civilians are the purposeful targets. It's time to delegitimize warfare altogether, in the public's mind. We don't have to tolerate continued subjugation to the grandiose ambitions of violence-prone men who talk a good game but care only about their own aggrandizement.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts